The Invisible Salary: Why “Free” Equity Schemes Are Costing Your Business More Than You Think

|

1. Introduction: The "No-Cash" Illusion

It is a classic boardroom manoeuvre in the world of SMEs: a talented recruit demands a higher salary and benefits than the current budget allows, or a family business patriarch looks to transition ownership to the next generation without a massive cash buyout. The solution seems elegant: We cannot increase your cash pay today, but we will give you shares in the business instead.

To many Managing Directors, this feels like a win-win. No cash leaves the bank account, no supplier sends an invoice, and no immediate debt is recorded. It is dangerously easy to fall into the psychological trap of believing these arrangements are free. However, Section 26 of IFRS for SMEs acts as a silent auditor in these situations. It steps into the boardroom with uncomfortable questions, reminding owners that while cash may stay in the bank, the business has still consumed something of immense value: professional services. Failing to recognise this invisible salary can lead to significant financial distortions that haunt the balance sheet for years.

2. The Recognition Trap: Why the P&L Doesn’t Care if You Used Cash

The core principle of Section 26 is uncompromising: if a business receives goods or services in exchange for equity, it is a transaction that must be recognised in the financial accounts. This requirement prevents companies from overstating profits or hiding the true cost of their compensation packages.

As the source context highlights:

We Didn’t Pay Cash, So It Didn’t Cost Us Anything'… Right? ... Ownership has value. When a business gives away equity instead of cash, it is still sacrificing economic resources. The sacrifice is simply less visible.

By ignoring these costs, an organisation presents an incomplete picture of its financial health. Artificially improved performance figures are eventually tempered by the reality that equity, a finite and valuable resource, has been surrendered.

The Takeaway: If your business has consumed value (work), it must record a cost, regardless of whether you paid in pounds or percentages.

Strategic Cash Flow Perspective

While Equity-Settled arrangements preserve immediate cash flow today, Cash-Settled "Phantom" plans create floating liabilities. If your company valuation grows, your eventual cash outflow grows with it, meaning your success creates a future liquidity pressure that must be forecasted now.

3. The Three Flavours of Dilution: Understanding Your Obligations

The way you promise equity dictates exactly how your balance sheet will react. Section 26 categorises these into three distinct buckets:

  • Equity-Settled: The business pays using its own shares or options. No cash is involved, but ownership is diluted.
  • Cash-Settled: This is the Phantom approach. You pay cash, but the amount is tied to the share price (e.g., share appreciation rights). This creates a direct liability.
  • Choice of Settlement: A hybrid where either the firm or the recipient can choose between cash or shares. These are accounting minefields that require careful classification of the underlying obligation.

4. The Long Game: Why You’re Paying Today for a Promise in Three Years

SME owners are often baffled by the timing of these expenses. Under Section 26, the cost is rarely a one-off hit. Instead, it is spread over the vesting period, the period during which an employee must work to earn their stake.

These generally involve:

  • Service Conditions: Simply staying with the firm (e.g., a three-year lock-in).
  • Performance Conditions: Hitting specific internal targets like revenue growth or profit margins.

Because the individual provides services throughout this period, the accounting rules require you to recognise the cost progressively. You are essentially expensing the promise as it is being earned, not just when the shares are finally issued.

5. Market vs. Non-Market Conditions: The High-Stakes Distinction

This is where the technical nuances of Section 26 can feel like a genuine injustice to the business owner. The standard treats Market Conditions (such as reaching a specific share price) differently from Non-Market Conditions (such as hitting a profit target).

The Sting: If an employee fails a Service Condition (they quit early), you can usually reverse the previously recognised expense. However, if they fail a Market Condition (the share price target is never hit), the expense remains on your books. This is because market conditions are incorporated into the grant-date valuation from the very beginning. You have already recognized the expense in your accounts, even though the employee never ultimately received the benefit. This is a technical landmine that can permanently depress reported profits.

The Takeaway: Market-based targets are "baked in" from day one; you pay for them in your accounts whether the target is hit or not.

6. The Measurement Headache: Fair Value in a Private World

For a listed company, finding the Fair Value of a share is as easy as checking a ticker tape. For an SME, it is a subjective and dangerous exercise. Since your shares aren't publicly traded, you must use valuation techniques or option pricing models that are often complex and open to auditor scrutiny.

Recognising that this creates undue cost or effort, IFRS for SMEs provides a vital life raft: Intrinsic Value. This is the difference between the current share value and the price the employee must pay to exercise the option. While simpler, it still requires a robust valuation of the underlying business, an area where many MDs lose their temper when they see the professional fees involved.

7. The "Phantom" Liability: Where Success Hits the P&L

Cash-settled arrangements, such as Phantom Share Plans, carry a specific danger that equity-settled deals do not. While equity-settled payments are usually valued once at the start, cash-settled liabilities must be remeasured at every single reporting date.

If your company’s valuation soars, your liability to your employees soars with it. This can result in a sudden, massive expense hitting the profit and loss account precisely when the business is doing well. It is the ultimate accounting irony: your success as a business owner can simultaneously damage your reported profits.

8. Handshake Deals and the "Legal vs. Accounting" Gap

One of the most common SME mistakes is ignoring informal arrangements. Whether it is a verbal promise made to a co-founder during a startup phase or a gentleman’s agreement in a family business restructuring, Section 26 does not care about the lack of a formal contract.

If a promise has been made and the service has been provided, the accounting standard requires it to be recognised. An SME owner might think a handshake isn't legally binding yet, but from a reporting perspective, the invisible salary is already accruing the moment that person sits down at their desk.

9. The Taxman’s Timing Gap: The Section 29 Connection

SMEs frequently overlook the "Section 29 Connection", the deferred tax implications of share schemes. There is often a significant timing gap: your P&L takes a hit for the accounting expense today, but the tax authorities may not allow a deduction until the shares are actually issued or the cash is paid years later. Managing this gap is essential to ensure your tax bill doesn't provide another nasty surprise.

10. Transparency is Your Best Defence

External stakeholders, particularly sophisticated investors or lenders, look at share-based payments with a hawk's eye. They fear hidden obligations and the dilution of their own interests.

Section 26 requires full disclosure of the nature of these arrangements and how you calculated their value. Proper disclosure ensures that those looking at your books understand exactly how much of the company’s future has been promised away, protecting your credibility during valuations or exit negotiations.

11. Conclusion: The True Cost of Ownership

Section 26 of IFRS for SMEs ensures that financial statements tell a complete story, not just a cash story. It forces a business to confront the reality that equity is a finite and valuable resource.

As you look to attract top-tier talent or transition your family legacy, remember that there is no such thing as a free share. These incentives are powerful tools, but without proper accounting, they are landmines waiting to derail your next valuation or audit. Are your current equity promises properly reflected in your books, or are you sitting on an invisible expense that is about to become very visible indeed?

Disclaimer

This article is intended solely for educational and informational purposes and does not constitute professional accounting, audit, tax, legal, or financial advice. While every effort has been made to reflect the principles of Section 26 of the IFRS for SMEs accurately, accounting treatment may vary depending on the specific facts and circumstances of an entity. Readers should consult a qualified professional accountant or advisor before applying any concepts discussed in this article to real-world transactions or financial statements.

Most read articles

The 75% Leak: How Unutilized VAT Maims Working Capital in Ghana

|
Image
1. The Compliance Illusion Value Added Tax (VAT) is often viewed as a standard monthly filing requirement—a routine cycle of submissions and credit offsets to remain compliant with the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA). However, looking at it strictly through an administrative lens overlooks its actual impact. VAT is not just a regulatory obligation; it directly influences corporate liquidity . When input VAT goes unutilised, it does more than just sit as an asset on the balance sheet . Under the rules of the Value Added Tax Act, 2013 (Act 870), unutilised input VAT can quietly absorb available working capital.  This restriction on claims usually occurs under specific operational or statutory circumstances, such as trading without a formal VAT registration, missing the strict 6-month statutory deadline, holding invalid or unverified electronic invoices, or incurring expenses that are legally disallowed, including entertainment and passen...
Read more

Permanent Establishment vs Tax Residency in Ghana: Key Differences Explained

|
Image
In the high-stakes arena of international business, the most expensive mistake a firm can make is miscalculating its tax identity. For those operating within the Ghanaian corridor, the question of "Where exactly should I be paying my tax?" is rarely a simple one. The confusion usually stems from a sophisticated tug-of-war between two distinct legal concepts: Permanent Establishment (PE) and Tax Residency. Getting this wrong leads to aggressive audits and frozen cash flows; getting it right ensures you are playing by the rules of the "Gateway to Africa." This guide breaks down the complex Ghanaian tax landscape into the actionable insights you need to determine whether the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) views you as a local citizen or a temporary guest. 1. Permanent Establishment in Ghana: When your business creates a taxable presence Think of a Permanent Establishment as your fixed footprint  in Ghana. Even i...
Read more

The GRA Calendar vs. Your Cash Flow: How to Navigate Act 896 Without Going Broke

|
Image
1. The Calendar Conflict: Battle Maps vs. Statutory Coldness E very business owner operates by a commercial calendar,  a high-stakes battle map where you track sales, manage inventory , and fight to keep expenses in check. This 12-month window is your Accounting Year. However, while you are focused on operational peaks, the tax authority is looking at a completely different schedule: the statutory Year of Assessment (YOA). In Ghana, the Year of Assessment is a fixed, cold statutory period that always runs from 1 January to 31 December. This is the government's accounting year or budgeting period. For the unprepared, the friction between your commercial reality and this legal mandate is a silent profit killer. To survive, you must master the bridge between the two, a concept known under the Income Tax Act, 2015 (Act 896) as the Basis Period. 2. ...
Read more

The "Ghost" Assets on Your Balance Sheet: Why Zero-Value Equipment Is a Strategic Red Flag

|
Image
The Hook: The Invisible Workforce W alk onto any established factory floor or into a logistics hub, and you will see them: mission-critical machines, specialized tooling, or heavy-duty delivery vehicles performing at peak capacity. Yet, if you look at the balance sheet , these assets have vanished. They are carried at a book value of zero. This invisible workforce  creates a paradox for corporate management. On the surface, it suggests extreme efficiency, productive capacity that costs the business nothing in depreciation . In reality, a zero-value asset that remains operational is a loud signal that your accounting has decoupled from operational reality. It indicates that management's original estimates no longer reflects operational reality. While the immediate instinct for many is to fix  this through revaluation, this is often a dangerous trap. I view these "ghost assets" not as a sign of thri...
Read more

The "SME" Misnomer: Why Your Business Might Be Using the Wrong Accounting Language and Paying for It

|
Image
1. Introduction: The Eligibility Illusion Over the years, I have found that one of the most persistent misconceptions among corporate decision makers is the belief that SME  accounting is a privilege granted by the size of the business. Many executives assume that if their headcount is lean or their revenue has not breached a certain threshold, the IFRS for SMEs standard is their default reporting language. In reality, eligibility has nothing to do with size and everything to do with status. Think of Section 1 of the IFRS for SMEs standard as a Gateway . It is a single, decisive entry point that determines whether you are permitted to use this streamlined framework. If you don’t have the right key, the door remains locked. Choosing the wrong framework isn’t just a technical oversight; it is a failure that results in financial statements that are either unnecessarily complex or legally non-comp...
Read more

Why Your "Profitable" Small Business Might Be Failing: The Accounting Trap

|
Image
1. The Fatal Financial Misdiagnosis You have checked every box. You have migrated to a premium cloud accounting suite, hired a more expensive accountant, and insisted on monthly reconciliations. Yet, despite the pristine digital records, the same white-knuckle anxiety remains. You are still sweating over the payroll run, suppliers are still chasing overdue invoices, and the quarterly tax bill feels less like a planned expense and more like a financial ambush. The hard truth is that many SME owners are solving the wrong problem. You may believe your business is struggling because of  messy books,  but businesses rarely collapse because of misunderstood debits and credits. They collapse because of a fundamental lack of cash discipline . While your accountant is busy recording history, your survival is dictated by your ability to control the future. If your cash reserves remain fragile despite improv...
Read more